[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bounties
From: |
Kieren MacMillan |
Subject: |
Re: bounties |
Date: |
Mon, 21 Jun 2010 12:57:38 -0400 |
Hi David,
> But when trying to hook people on a large scale on Lilypond, you'll find
> that there is a reason Lilypond was your tool of choice, and not theirs.
Of course. So the point is simply, how much resource do/can we [the community]
spend attempting to lure "the masses"? My guess is, the "sweet spot" -- where a
statistically significant group of people will consider Lilypond their "tool of
choice", over FinSibEtc -- is far in excess of the community's capacity in the
next 3-5 years.
> preview-latex has changed my needs for pen and paper for the creation of
> quite a bit of mathematical content. At some point of time, a tool
> might change your workflow.
TeXShop works like a charm for me.
> It is not rare for him to produce papers with 1000+ formulae.
Sounds like my last "sum of consecutive integer powers" paper. =)
> Emacs basically is an editing platform. If you can't warm to its
> generic feature set, for a particular application space there might
> exist modes and tools that make a decisive difference in usability.
True.
Kieren.
- Re: bounties, (continued)
- Re: bounties, Joseph Wakeling, 2010/06/20
- Re: bounties, David Kastrup, 2010/06/21
- Re: bounties, Joseph Wakeling, 2010/06/21
- Re: bounties, David Kastrup, 2010/06/21
- Re: bounties, Kieren MacMillan, 2010/06/21
- Re: bounties, David Kastrup, 2010/06/21
- Re: bounties,
Kieren MacMillan <=
- Re: bounties, Joseph Wakeling, 2010/06/22
- Re: bounties, Kieren MacMillan, 2010/06/22
- Re: Presentation: "Publisher-grade LilyPond" in Ottawa, Valentin Villenave, 2010/06/17