lilypond-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Problem with 2.13.30?


From: Reinhold Kainhofer
Subject: Re: Problem with 2.13.30?
Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2010 21:29:27 +0200
User-agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.32-24-generic; KDE/4.5.0; i686; ; )

Am Montag, 30. August 2010, 01:48:46 schrieb Reinhold Kainhofer:
> Am Montag, 30. August 2010, um 00:25:47 schrieben Sie:
> > > I don't really see any other way to turn the input path to an
> > > absolute path
> > > than calling os.path.abspath, in particular, since the input path
> > > can already
> > > be an absolute path...
> > 
> > But doesn't this solution create a worse problem
> > than the original one?  With this fix lilypondbook
> > cannot be used *at all* under Windows.  The original
> > problem has a simple workaround which could be documented
> > easily - the problem created by the fix has no
> > workaround.
> 
> Yes, I see the problem...
> On the other hand, without this fix, lilypond-book is not able to work with
> *.tex, *.html or *.texi input files at all (the bug is that when --output
> is given, then that wrong error message is triggered and lilypond-book
> refuses to work).
> There is also no workaround for this, except discouraging the use of these
> three extensions at all for input files :(
> 
> > I have to copy an old version of
> > lilypondbook into every new release in order to get
> > a working version.  We can't expect users to do that.
> 
> No, of course not. I'm thinking about how to make l-p work for both cases.

Should be fixed in git now.

Cheers,
Reinhold
-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------
Reinhold Kainhofer, address@hidden, http://reinhold.kainhofer.com/
 * Financial & Actuarial Math., Vienna Univ. of Technology, Austria
 * http://www.fam.tuwien.ac.at/, DVR: 0005886
 * LilyPond, Music typesetting, http://www.lilypond.org



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]