Re: ghostscript improvements in gub

[Graham Percival]

On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 11:10:50PM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Op dinsdag 31-08-2010 om 22:07 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef Graham
> Percival:
> 
> > Should I build GUB from the current head (i.e. including the
> > merged ghostscript branch), or should I keep on using the
> > 2.13.30-tagged version of GUB ?
> 
> The changes in GUB are steps towards upstream integration.
> IWBN to "test" those at one time or another, and although
> they "should work", better not use them if you want stability

For the record, it seems that the new GUB changes are ok; we
haven't had any complaints yet.  I'll continue using them for
releases.

Cheers,
- Graham