Re: [PATCH] Web: Easier editing: Add link to Abjad website.

[Mark Polesky]

Graham Percival wrote:
>> address@hidden Other programs can export LilyPond code
>> address@hidden Other programs that can export LilyPond code
>
> This makes it sound as though the previous programs can
> export lilypond code.  Only Denemo falls into that
> category; all the other programs are text editor-types.
>
> Could you just omit this change?

How about just "Programs that can export LilyPond code"?  If
you don't like that I'll just keep the old version.

>>  address@hidden://www.projectabjad.org/,Abjad}, a
>>  address@hidden://www.python.org/,Python} API for
>>  Formalized Score +Control, @qq{designed to help
>>  composers build up complex pieces of +LilyPond notation
>>  in an iterative and incremental way.}
>
> Hmm.  I know that the current entry for Strasheela uses
> @qq, but I'd rather avoid that.  Could you omit the @qq,
> or if you want to totally play by copyright law, ask
> Trevor (off-list) for permission to re-use that sentence
> fragment on our website?  Or just write a new one-sentence
> description?

Since the sentence is almost exactly what Trevor suggested
off-list (I condensed it from two sentences), I prefer to
keep the @qq, but if there's any other reason you don't like
the @qq, let me know.

> While we're at it, could you write a new description for
> [Strasheela]?  Again, I'd prefer to avoid a @qq unless
> it's necessary.  If not, I'm happy to do this; I used
> strasheela for my Masters degree.

I wouldn't know what to write; if you want to write it in
your reply, I'll add it to the patch.  Alternatively, we
could send them a simple request for permission to keep the
quote (unless again you have some other specific objection
to @qq).

- Mark