Re: docs addition, beaming cadenzas

[Trevor Daniels]

Keith E OHara wrote Tuesday, October 05, 2010 7:18 AM

>   In the existing @knownissues for cadenzaOn, I suggest adding one 
> sentence (in context below) encouraging manual beams. Users might 
> *think* autobeaming works through cadenzas, and it does for a 
> while, but it will not through longer cadenzas.

Thanks, Keith.  I made this change pretty much as you suggested.

[Graham: I believe it is right to include issues marked as 
enhancements in
the known issues list, especially those with low priority.  If these 
are ever
implemented the docs will need to be changed anyway, unlike bug 
fixes,
so the known issue list can then be amended.]

>   The immediately-following example depended on autobeaming, I 
> made its beam manual. (While I'm at it, I suggest this one be an 
> @example, because in this case the _code_ is the point, and the 
> image gives no useful information.)

Agreed

>   Two earlier examples use autobeaming in their cadenzas, so I 
> marked the two affected lines below, but this detail is not worth 
> much effort.

I fixed them anyway as you suggested

Trevor