[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: paper-defaults-init.ly questions
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: paper-defaults-init.ly questions |
Date: |
Sun, 05 Dec 2010 09:27:22 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Carl Sorensen <address@hidden> writes:
> On 12/4/10 4:51 PM, "David Kastrup" <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> Carl Sorensen <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>> Actually, I'm not sure that being exact matters, since a hundredth of
>>> a point is much lower than the resolution of my printer.
>>
>> It matters once you can't figure out why one system less than expected
>> is placed on the page, even though you calculated everything perfectly
>> well.
>
> Do you have an example that demonstrates this?
Not at hand. But stuff like that happens often enough in typesetting (I
know that it is fun in TeX): you have, say, blocks of 0.4in height on
8in, and get surprised that just 19 of them fit.
--
David Kastrup
- Re: paper-defaults-init.ly questions, (continued)
- Re: paper-defaults-init.ly questions, Mark Polesky, 2010/12/03
- Re: paper-defaults-init.ly questions, David Kastrup, 2010/12/03
- Re: paper-defaults-init.ly questions, Carl Sorensen, 2010/12/03
- Re: paper-defaults-init.ly questions, David Kastrup, 2010/12/03
- Re: paper-defaults-init.ly questions, Mark Polesky, 2010/12/04
- Re: paper-defaults-init.ly questions, Carl Sorensen, 2010/12/04
- Re: paper-defaults-init.ly questions, Mark Polesky, 2010/12/04
- Re: paper-defaults-init.ly questions, Carl Sorensen, 2010/12/04
- Re: paper-defaults-init.ly questions, David Kastrup, 2010/12/04
- Re: paper-defaults-init.ly questions, Carl Sorensen, 2010/12/04
- Re: paper-defaults-init.ly questions,
David Kastrup <=
Re: paper-defaults-init.ly questions, Mark Polesky, 2010/12/04