[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lilybuntu 2 and instructions
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: lilybuntu 2 and instructions |
Date: |
Mon, 20 Dec 2010 19:03:09 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 11:42:59AM -0700, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>
> In general, a Remix
> can have applications from the Ubuntu archives added, or default
> applications removed, but removing or changing any infrastructure components
> (e.g., shared libraries or desktop components) will result in changes too
> large for the resulting product to be called by a Trademark.
Hmm.
> We have "default applications removed" and have "some variance in package
> selection". Therefore, this is not just Ubuntu, it's a derived work from
> Ubuntu, at least in Ubuntu's mind. And Ubuntu wants it called a "remix" if
> we are going to use any trademarks.
The one sticky point might be removing openoffice+evolution. That
may not be considered a "minimal change" and might be "removing
infrastructure components... desktop components". If we wanted to
use the "ubuntu remix" name, then I gather that we'd best only add
developer-oriented packages, and do the extra installations
(fontforge, git-cl, and some links on the desktop)
> I'm OK with Graham's name. I might actually prefer u-contrib-lily, because
> it sounds almost like an invitation -- "you can contribute to lilypond".
Cute. :)
Cheers,
- Graham
- Re: lilybuntu 2 and instructions, (continued)
- Re: lilybuntu 2 and instructions, Carl Sorensen, 2010/12/17
- Re: lilybuntu 2 and instructions, Graham Percival, 2010/12/17
- Re: lilybuntu 2 and instructions, address@hidden, 2010/12/17
- Re: lilybuntu 2 and instructions, Colin Campbell, 2010/12/17
- Re: lilybuntu 2 and instructions, Patrick Schmidt, 2010/12/18
- Re: lilybuntu 2 and instructions, Jonathan Kulp, 2010/12/18
- Re: lilybuntu 2 and instructions, Valentin Villenave, 2010/12/18
Re: lilybuntu 2 and instructions, Graham Percival, 2010/12/20