Re: Potential issue 39 fix w/ patch

[Keith OHara]

Mike Solomon <mikesol <at> ufl.edu> writes:
> I've included before and after photos.

Hi Mike.
The hemidemisemiquaver(*) and the minim are supposed to be simultaneous, so I 
do not like the horizontal shift.

There is no mention in issue 39 of the desired output.  The only thing I can 
imagine wanting done automatically is lengthening the stem.  Is it too late for 
that when note-collisions are being handled?

If the best achievable output is only slightly more preferable than the 
collision, but costs significant computation for every note-collision, we might 
want to simply note this one as 'not worth fixing with the methods tried so 
far'.

I'll still try your patch. 
--
Keith

[*] I'm American, actually, so would normally say 64th note; I just like the 
cheap thrill I get out of writing hemidemisemiquaver.