Re: [PATCHES] Documentation for some of my features in 2.13

[Colin Campbell]

On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 14:07 +0100, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
> > What would possibly be more useful to doc volunteers, and more
> > productive of developers' time, might be to post a draft, outline, or
> > series of bullet points, probably on bug-, so the doc people can take
> > the patch process from the start.   With devs putting doc patches on
> > Reitveldt, at least one doc person isn't sure whether it's a good idea
> > to suggest improvements to the dev who started the patch, and waste more
> > of his time. AIUI, to get out of this situation, Reinhold should revert
> > his patch, and I can then take the content and put it through channels,
> > handling any further work on it, while Reinhold gets back to his work.
> 
> I'm fine with that, too. Can you simply take the patch from rietveld and 
> improve it, or shall I send them as attachments to bug-lilypond? Or shall I 
> even push these raw patches so that you (or whoever else wants to improve 
> them) can work directly on git?
> 
> Cheers,
> Reinhold

I'll just take the patches, tweak a bit, and resubmit.  I'll rely on
James or Trevor to push when the patches are reviewed.


Colin
-- 
It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by
bolts of lightning. - Bill Watterson, comic strip artist (1958- ), in
his comic strip Calvin & Hobbes