Re: exact inversion (issue4173065)

[Benkő Pál]

> The patch works fine, but the documentation could be improved.

agreed.

> Expanding the example in a different section to show \inversion is not
> optimal.

sorry, I don't get that.

> We need an @lilypond{} immediately after the @example showing
> the syntax in the Inversion section.
>
> Also, with this addition, it would be sensible to take \retrograde out
> of the Modal transformations section and place it in a section of its
> own, like Inversion.

agreed.

> All this could be done in a separate patch I guess, so LGTM.

should I move retrograde into its own section now or is there a
volunteer who can improve the documentation on transpose and
inversion as well after pushing as is?

p