Re: Doc: harmonics and slides (issue4186049)

[Patrick Schmidt]

Am 28.02.2011 um 14:21 schrieb address@hidden:

> One comment.
> 
> Thanks for your time.
> 
> 
> http://codereview.appspot.com/4186049/diff/6002/Documentation/notation/fretted-strings.itely
> File Documentation/notation/fretted-strings.itely (right):
> 
> http://codereview.appspot.com/4186049/diff/6002/Documentation/notation/fretted-strings.itely#newcode427
> Documentation/notation/fretted-strings.itely:427: @end lilypond
> Apologies for my ignorance on fretted music, but is there a reason we
> need both the \ottava #1 and the \clef "treble_8" functions in this?
> 
> That is, can we omit one/all of them and still make the example make
> sense?
Hm, we could omit all of them but this might be confusing for guitarists. 
Guitarists normally read music as if there were a "treble_8" even when there is 
a "treble"-clef. I probably included the \ottava #1 in one of my first snippets 
to avoid very high notes. But in this case it is not really necessary, indeed!

Thanks,
patrick
> 
> I know it seems trivial but it does make the @lilypond even simpler and
> more compact.
> 
> http://codereview.appspot.com/4186049/
>