[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Potential fix for issue 1504. (issue4237057)
From: |
mtsolo |
Subject: |
Re: Potential fix for issue 1504. (issue4237057) |
Date: |
Thu, 10 Mar 2011 08:04:34 +0000 |
Reviewers: hanwenn,
Message:
Thanks for the comments!
Below I have a question about commonx - the other fix will be easy to
implement.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4237057/diff/1/lily/beam.cc
File lily/beam.cc (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/4237057/diff/1/lily/beam.cc#newcode173
lily/beam.cc:173: span_data.push_back (get_beam_span
(orig->broken_intos_[i], commonx));
On 2011/03/09 23:03:44, hanwenn wrote:
this looks wrong - different broken pieces cannot ever share a
commonx.
Odd - it gets correct results for some reason (I honestly don't know
how...).
What would be a better way of grabbing these coordinates (the left and
right points of the beam)?
http://codereview.appspot.com/4237057/diff/1/lily/spanner.cc
File lily/spanner.cc (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/4237057/diff/1/lily/spanner.cc#newcode405
lily/spanner.cc:405: Spanner::broken_spanner_index (Spanner const *sp)
On 2011/03/09 23:03:44, hanwenn wrote:
why not make it a real member funtcion?
Doable! I'll do it w/ my next patch.
Description:
Potential fix for issue 1504.
Changes feathered beaming such that broken feather beams pick up at the
same degree of feather-ness as the previous line.
Please review this at http://codereview.appspot.com/4237057/
Affected files:
A input/regression/beam-feather-breaking.ly
M lily/beam.cc
M lily/include/beam.hh
M lily/include/spanner.hh
M lily/spanner.cc
- Potential fix for issue 1504. (issue4237057), hanwenn, 2011/03/09
- Re: Potential fix for issue 1504. (issue4237057), mtsolo, 2011/03/10
- Re: Potential fix for issue 1504. (issue4237057),
mtsolo <=
- Re: Potential fix for issue 1504. (issue4237057), hanwenn, 2011/03/11
- Re: Potential fix for issue 1504. (issue4237057), mtsolo, 2011/03/12
- Re: Potential fix for issue 1504. (issue4237057), hanwenn, 2011/03/12
- Re: Potential fix for issue 1504. (issue4237057), hanwenn, 2011/03/13