Re: Include and document the Articulate script by Peter Chubb. (issue4277067)

[paconet . org]

New patch coming soon after license update.


http://codereview.appspot.com/4277067/diff/1/Documentation/notation/input.itely
File Documentation/notation/input.itely (right):

http://codereview.appspot.com/4277067/diff/1/Documentation/notation/input.itely#newcode1690
Documentation/notation/input.itely:1690: more realistic MIDI output is
available by means of the Articulate
On 2011/03/20 17:30:46, Graham Percival wrote:
> could "the Articulate script" be a @ref{} ?

Done.

http://codereview.appspot.com/4277067/diff/1/Documentation/notation/input.itely#newcode2307
Documentation/notation/input.itely:2307: @unnumberedsubsubsec Using the
Articulate script
On 2011/03/20 17:30:46, Graham Percival wrote:
> IMO, the @unnumberedsubsubsec doesn't add anything.  I suggest
omitting this
> line entirely.

> If you really really want that line there for some reason, then please
add a
> @node right above it, to match the doc policy.

I agree it is unnecessary.  I added no @nodes because previous sections
@unnumberedsubsubsec Unsupported in MIDI etc don't have a @node.

http://codereview.appspot.com/4277067/diff/1/Documentation/notation/input.itely#newcode2316
Documentation/notation/input.itely:2316: and in the @code{\score}
section do
On 2011/03/20 17:30:46, Graham Percival wrote:
> I do not believe that you "have to" include the \unfoldRepeats
section.  Could
> you just change this to:

> To create a MIDI file with all repeats played, add this to your
\score:

Here, I just copied the lines provided by Peter.  \articulate is needed
AFAIK, \unfoldRepeats not essential but still could be for trills.

http://codereview.appspot.com/4277067/