RE: landscape mode vs. new paper size

[James Lowe]

Graham,

)-----Original Message-----
)From: Graham Percival [mailto:address@hidden
)Sent: 01 April 2011 16:27
)To: James Lowe
)Cc: address@hidden
)Subject: Re: landscape mode vs. new paper size
)
)On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 12:50:07PM +0000, James Lowe wrote:
)> That's OK, we can still do this with 'proper' paper sizes with
)> internationally defined names rather than our own custom ones.
)>
)> For example, we could define some 'C' sizes which are used for
)> defining envelopes, are as internationally recognised as 'A'
)> sizes but come in landscape dimensions small enough to be useful for
)> us to use in the doc, I think.
)
)ok, great!
)
)Could we get this part moving?  i.e. make a separate patch for the NR 3
)chapter -- just add an extra @lilypond to the very end of the chapter, if
)nothing else comes to mind -- that shows a tagline.
)
)The goal(s) are:
)1. get at least one paper size defined
)2. get the @lilypond[options] finalized
)3. feel good that after working for 3 months, there's at least one commit
)on this topic.  :)
)
)

No problem. I'll try to get another (hopefully final) draft up by the end of 
the weekend.

)Treat the breakbefore issue as completely separate for now.

Thanks, yes please. I obviously need to re-read the LM

James