lilypond-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Policy about not-yet-regression tests?


From: Han-Wen Nienhuys
Subject: Re: Policy about not-yet-regression tests?
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2011 11:24:03 -0300

On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 11:01 AM, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
> do we just want regression tests for things that _do_ work currently, or
> is it ok to add tests for things that _should_ work but don't, as long
> as the test does not bomb out?

I think adding things that don't work is not a good idea; it will
confuse people, and add noise for developers.  We have the bug tracker
to keep track of feature requests.



> changes.  Adding regression tests early can also mean that bug reports
> that get cured by independent work get noticed instead of remaining
> open.

Almost all bugfixes should be accompanied by a regtest; if they are
not Graham's police should start hunting down offenders.

-- 
Han-Wen Nienhuys - address@hidden - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]