Re: Better width functions for the current arpeggio print functions. (issue4517051)

[address@hidden]

On May 11, 2011, at 2:19 PM, Neil Puttock wrote:

> On 11 May 2011 19:11,  <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
>> The issue is that, for the chord bracket and chord slur (and Bertrand's 
>> eventual chord brace, which hypothetically varies significantly in its X 
>> dimension as it gets larger), the width of the grob is dependent on knowing 
>> the extremal note head positions, which triggers a vertical alignment.
> 
> Surely not the chord bracket?  It has a fixed width (line 171 of
> arpeggio.cc), though perhaps it should be tweakable.
> 

Sorry - yes, you're right.  I amend my comment to chord slurs and braces.

>> Any suggestions on how to get this information without triggering the 
>> vertical alignment?
> 
> Sorry, no.
> 

I'll try to think of something...

~Mike