[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ambitus: special handling of small ambits' lines (issue4609041)
From: |
Janek Warchoł |
Subject: |
Re: ambitus: special handling of small ambits' lines (issue4609041) |
Date: |
Tue, 21 Jun 2011 15:03:51 +0200 |
Hi Karin,
i'm back from my short vacation.
2011/6/17 <address@hidden>:
> the description explains clearly how to use the parameters gap and woot.
> So, it is a good starting point to understanding the scheme code that
> follows.
Good!
>> Yes, the quanting stays the same.
>
> I couldn't find the verb "to quant" in a dictionary. Is it short for
> "to quantize"?
Yes. It's used a lot in beaming code.
> If so, it might be clearer to change the description in output-lib.scm.
Good point, it's better to avoid abbreviations.
> Finally, I tested the gap adjustment for several intervals. For a fifth:
>
> \new Staff \with { \consists Ambitus_engraver } {
> c' g'
> }
>
> the bottom of the ambitus line is very close to the lower note in the
> default case. Is this on purpose? I would expect the ambitus line to be
> more or less centered between note heads.
Have you zoomed the output to check it? I suppose its a rasterization
problem; a lot of things seem to be wrong when output is watched
unzoomed on a computer screen (for example one stem in the attachment
looks two times thicker than the other, while in fact it's exactly the
same).
Thanks for review!
Janek
bad rasterization.png
Description: PNG image
- Re: ambitus: special handling of small ambits' lines (issue4609041), (continued)
- Re: ambitus: special handling of small ambits' lines (issue4609041), tdanielsmusic, 2011/06/13
- Re: ambitus: special handling of small ambits' lines (issue4609041), lemniskata . bernoullego, 2011/06/13
- Re: ambitus: special handling of small ambits' lines (issue4609041), tdanielsmusic, 2011/06/13
- Re: ambitus: special handling of small ambits' lines (issue4609041), lemniskata . bernoullego, 2011/06/15
- Re: ambitus: special handling of small ambits' lines (issue4609041), karin . hoethker, 2011/06/16
- Re: ambitus: special handling of small ambits' lines (issue4609041),
Janek Warchoł <=
- Re: ambitus: special handling of small ambits' lines (issue4609041), mtsolo, 2011/06/17
- Re: ambitus: special handling of small ambits' lines (issue4609041), lemniskata . bernoullego, 2011/06/21
Re: ambitus: special handling of small ambits' lines (issue4609041), n . puttock, 2011/06/22