Re: LSR lovers: walk the walk

[Graham Percival]

On Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 06:46:22PM +0200, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 3. Juli 2011, 17:31:19 schrieb Graham Percival:
> > 1. we need to ask Sebastiano to upgrade LSR to 2.14.1.  This may
> > require extra manual attention to upgrade some snippets that
> > convert-ly can't handle.
> 
> Actually, I have been thinking about implementing multiple-version support in 
> LSR (i.e. snippets for 2.12, 2.14 and master). The database already has some 
> fields min_version and max_version, but they have not been used since 2.4.3...

I don't think we should ever use unstable for lsr.  If a snippet
compiles in the current stable, then just use stable; if it
requires unstable, then I forsee too many people getting confused
about that.

Remember, we're looking at a new stable version every 3-4 months.
That's not too long to wait for until a new feature is ready.

Cheers,
- Graham