Re: Fix for Issue 620. (issue4814041)

[Neil Puttock]

On 24 July 2011 09:55, address@hidden <address@hidden> wrote:

> Why is it a bad thing to do it this way?  Currently, the 
> Beam_collision_engraver implements dynamic filtering based on interface, and 
> I don't think there's a problem with that (it is the only way to make it 
> ignore certain grobs on the fly).

I don't like the name.  We already have `core interfaces'; they're
grob-interface, item-interface and spanner-interface.

> Creating a new interface would be OK but would make it harder to filter out 
> interfaces on the fly (people would have to override a grob's "meta" 
> property, which seems hard).

Do you have a scenario whereby a user might want to override this?

Cheers,
Neil