Re: no movement on Critical issues; 2.16 in Oct ?

[Jan Warchoł]

2011/7/31 David Kastrup <address@hidden>:
> Graham Percival <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 09:42:36AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
>>> Graham Percival <address@hidden> writes:
>>>
>>> > I haven't seen any interest in
>>> >   http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1771
>>>
>>> My take on this (if nobody is going to protest in the next few hours) is
>>> to revert the flawed fix.
>>
>> I think that's entirely reasonable.  IMO, if there's no clear
>> offer of a fix within 48 hours of a bad commit, we should revert
>> it.
>
> Within 48 hours of pinpointing the bad commit.

+1.  If we manage to get stable releases every few months, i think a
policy of reverting any flawed commit that appeared after last stable
release (i mean x in 2.x.y, not y) would be good.

I can help with these bugs when i close currently opened issues and
sort out my repository after grand fixcc-ing (estimated to happen next
weekend).

cheers,
Janek