[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bar line shading in PNGs
From: |
Jan Warchoł |
Subject: |
Re: Bar line shading in PNGs |
Date: |
Tue, 2 Aug 2011 22:47:00 +0200 |
2011/7/31 Phil Holmes <address@hidden>:
> Don't think this is a problem, but it is a bit interesting. I've been
> trying to run my pixel comparator to compare 15.7 to 15.5 and getting a
> difference in the bar lines of every image - presumably owing to the work to
> stop the PDF artefacts. Looking carefully at the bar lines, you can see
> they're not actually black - they're various shades of grey, in both
> versions. The difference is that the shading has changed. I attach 2
> highly magnified images - one with normal contrast, and one with it adjusted
> to emphasise the shading.
Interesting indeed. I guess it works like this: when rasterizing
postscript output Lily decides that barlines are not thick enough to
be represented by a perfectly black 2 pixel wide line. Therefore she
chooses to draw it as a dark grey 2 pixel wide line (dark grey 2 pixel
wide line looks from the distance like something a bit narrower than
perfectly black 2 pixel wide line). However, on the spots where
barline and stafflines intersect, the "blackness" of the barline is
added to the pixel shade, making it darker.
In other words, a pixel on the intersection of barline and staffline
has more reasons to be completely black (namely, two reasons: being on
a barline and being on a staffline) than pixels lying on a barline and
not on the staffline.
thanks for showing this!
Janek
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: Bar line shading in PNGs,
Jan Warchoł <=