[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Doc writing for unpure-pure-containers
From: |
address@hidden |
Subject: |
Re: Doc writing for unpure-pure-containers |
Date: |
Mon, 14 Nov 2011 11:34:35 +0100 |
On Nov 14, 2011, at 11:23 AM, Peekay Ex wrote:
> Mike,
>
> On 14 November 2011 10:18, address@hidden <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Hey all,
>>
>> I've answered a couple questions recently where unpure-pure-containers have
>> come in handy and think it'd be beneficial to have some text in the notation
>> manual about them. However, understanding pure properties is scary for
>> developers, so I'd imagine that it'd be downright nightmarish for users.
>> James - would you be interested in helping me out with this? I think that
>> you're good at formulating things in a way that people understand.
>>
>
> No problem, but before you start on the work, suggest a place where
> you think it should go.
>
> For example were you thinking
>
> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.14/Documentation/notation/advanced-tweaks
>
This seems appropriate.
> Or thereabouts?
>
> I ask because perhaps this kind of information may not be appropriate
> for the NR.
>
> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.14/Documentation/extending/index.html
>
This seems less well suited, as the use of unpure-pure-closures is not really
programming work but rather a tweak.
Cheers,
MS