Re: Makes two functions in bezier-tools.scm public. (issue 5450046)

[Carl Sorensen]

On 11/29/11 4:24 PM, "address@hidden" <address@hidden> wrote:

>On Nov 29, 2011, at 11:39 PM, address@hidden wrote:
>
>> I don't think we should be defining the bezier routines as public.
>> Users shouldn't call them directly, IMO.  We should be operating on
>> grobs.  And there is no bezier grob (at least as far as I can
>> determine).
>> 
>> Encouraging users to goe below the published interfaces is bad behavior.
>> 
>> What is the reason you want these to be public?
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>
>I have made them public in my own version of LilyPond in order to not
>have to \include a Lily-fied version of bezier-tools.scm.  I use these
>tools to make crazy noteheads.  However, I know nothing about software
>design - what your saying makes complete sense, and I can just copy and
>paste the file into my working directory and \include it so as not to go
>against the model you propose above.

It seems like you ought to be able to do something as simple as

(define-public b-split bezier-split)

in your file.

Thanks,

Carl