Re: Doc: NR improve 1.6.3 examples (issue 5448129)

[pkx166h]

Reviewers: dak,

Message:
Corrections from David.

James


http://codereview.appspot.com/5448129/diff/1/Documentation/notation/staff.itely
File Documentation/notation/staff.itely (right):

http://codereview.appspot.com/5448129/diff/1/Documentation/notation/staff.itely#newcode869
Documentation/notation/staff.itely:869: }
On 2011/12/07 09:31:38, dak wrote:
> As explained previously, _this_ _will_ _not_ _work_.  You need to
enclose the
> music following \with { ... } in braces or only the very first term
will belong
> to the new Staff.

Done.

http://codereview.appspot.com/5448129/diff/1/Documentation/notation/staff.itely#newcode886
Documentation/notation/staff.itely:886: }
On 2011/12/07 09:31:38, dak wrote:
> Again, the following music needs to be enclosed in braces so that it
is actually
> part of the Staff.  Later examples are changed appropriately, so this
is likely
> just an oversight.

Done.

Description:
Doc: NR improve 1.6.3 examples

Added '\new Staff \with' construct to make sure
instrument names are printed in all cases - esp. when
using parallel voices and grace notes.

Tracker issue 2076

Please review this at http://codereview.appspot.com/5448129/

Affected files:
  M Documentation/notation/staff.itely