Re: 2.15.22 Regtests

[address@hidden]

On Dec 18, 2011, at 4:18 PM, Kieren MacMillan wrote:

> Hello all,
> 
>> Uh, in particular the "wahh" looks totally horrible.  It is one thing to
>> go over the bar line.  It is another to run into the next name without a
>> modicum of padding.
> 
> Agreed — I actually prefer the ability (i.e., option) for the chord name to 
> hang over the barline, but padding is definitely required before the next 
> chord name.
> 
> 

There are a few ways to get the padding.
You can add an extra-spacing-width of #'(0 . 0.3).
You can also add the Bar_line_engraver to the ChordNames context if you don't 
like the bar-line hangover and then make the bar-line Y-extent '(0 . 0) and the 
BarLine transparent.

Cheers,
MS