[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
13:35:08 up 20:27, 2 users, load average: 0.07, 0.07, 0.07 (issue 546404
From: |
Carl . D . Sorensen |
Subject: |
13:35:08 up 20:27, 2 users, load average: 0.07, 0.07, 0.07 (issue 5464045) |
Date: |
Mon, 19 Dec 2011 19:38:04 +0000 |
Hi Ian,
I feel pretty much unqualified to comment on this, since the details are
way over my head. Since it works (and you've tested it on both 1.8 and
2), I assume that most things about it are OK.
I have a couple of questions:
1) How do we decide when we need to include (use-modules (scm
markup-facility-defs)) in our input files? Is it to be included any
time we define our own markup commands?
2) It seems you've replaced format with fancy-format in multiple places,
even though in your patch set you only describe doing it once. I
understand the need of using fancy-format when doing the roman numeral
formatting, but I'm not sure why you've changed it in the other places.
Thanks,
Carl
http://codereview.appspot.com/5464045/diff/2001/scm/define-markup-commands.scm
File scm/define-markup-commands.scm (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/5464045/diff/2001/scm/define-markup-commands.scm#newcode1989
scm/define-markup-commands.scm:1989: prev-result)))
The previous spacing was correct. prev-result should align with
(char-list
http://codereview.appspot.com/5464045/diff/2001/scm/define-markup-commands.scm#newcode2194
scm/define-markup-commands.scm:2194: ;(start-repl)
Is this a leftover that should be removed?
http://codereview.appspot.com/5464045/
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- 13:35:08 up 20:27, 2 users, load average: 0.07, 0.07, 0.07 (issue 5464045),
Carl . D . Sorensen <=