lilypond-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Segfault 2.15.23 Span_bar_stub_engraver


From: David Kastrup
Subject: Re: Segfault 2.15.23 Span_bar_stub_engraver
Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2012 09:41:10 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.92 (gnu/linux)

Jay Anderson <address@hidden> writes:

> On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 1:12 AM, address@hidden
> <address@hidden> wrote:
>> On Jan 3, 2012, at 9:02 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
>>> If he hadn't rerun configure since before version 2.15.21, I think that
>>> the compilation would likely have failed for other reasons.  The problem
>>> report is for 2.15.23.  It may be worth for him to report the CXXFLAGS
>>> setting in config.status just to be on the safe side, but I consider it
>>> unlikely that this particular problem has not already been covered.
>>>
>
> I pulled down lilypond and build new just last week.
>
> CXXFLAGS in config.status is:
> - With optimization (default): "O2 -finline-functions -g -pipe
> -fno-optimize-sibling-calls"
> - Without optimization: "-g -pipe -fno-optimize-sibling-calls"
>
>> Are you using an optimized binary?  Mine is unoptimized.  Please try
>> ./autogen.sh --disable-optimizing before compiling and let me know
>> if that makes the segfault go away.
>
> I found --disable-optimising instead. Same result.
>
> I can't reproduce this on my wife's mac or on my laptop (also running
> ubuntu 11.10). The only difference I can think of is I'm running
> 64-bit and my laptop is 32-bit. Unless someone else can reproduce this
> issue don't spend much more time on this.

Can you use git bisect for identifying the commit where things go wrong
for you?

> I have a good solution (adding in the dynamics). Thanks!

That sounds like a workaround rather than a solution.  It would be good
to find the actual reason.

-- 
David Kastrup




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]