[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Doc search: update to version 2.15, use it in the "site:" part (issu
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: Doc search: update to version 2.15, use it in the "site:" part (issue 5530043) |
Date: |
Tue, 10 Jan 2012 03:10:18 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 02:10:24PM +0000, address@hidden wrote:
> I totally share your sentiment, but we depend on an external entity
> here, which we cannot control. Suppose we go from 2.15.x to 2.17.x and
> put the documentation under "v2.17". For some time, Google won't have
> the new location in its index, so the search would get nothing. It
> would be better to keep "v2.15" in the search for a while and have a
> redirection from "v2.15" to "v2.17".
Great point! Could you add a comment to this effect to the top of
this file? there's no way that I'll remember otherwise.
> Speaking of redirections, I would
> prefer that Lilypond had just two versions of its documentation online -
> latest "stable" and latest "development". "v2.12" and "v2.14" shoould
> redirect to "stable", "v2.15" should redirect to "development".
We want to keep all stable docs available for historical reasons,
but I'm not opposed to directing people to
/doc/stable/
/doc/development/
rather than vX.Y. If you feel like looking into this, the
htaccess is in Documentation/web/server/
- Graham
- Re: Doc search: update to version 2.15, use it in the "site:" part (issue 5530043), graham, 2012/01/09
- Re: Doc search: update to version 2.15, use it in the "site:" part (issue 5530043), pkx166h, 2012/01/13
- Re: Doc search: update to version 2.15, use it in the "site:" part (issue 5530043), plroskin, 2012/01/13
- Re: Doc search: update to version 2.15, use it in the "site:" part (issue 5530043), graham, 2012/01/13
- Re: Doc search: update to version 2.15, use it in the "site:" part (issue 5530043), pkx166h, 2012/01/13