[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Thinking about putting together a grant to support development onLil
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Thinking about putting together a grant to support development onLilyPond |
Date: |
Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:32:53 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.92 (gnu/linux) |
"Phil Holmes" <address@hidden> writes:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Han-Wen Nienhuys" <address@hidden>
> To: "Carl Sorensen" <address@hidden>
>
>>> C) Development of score_ocr2ly, which would take a score pdf and turn it
>>> into .ly files matching the lilypond scoring standard
>>
>> Heh. This is a known problem, and the OCR part is very, very
>> difficult. It also has nothing to do with lilypond.
>
>
> There are a number of commercial products that, given a perfect
> representation of a score, convert it to perfect musicXML - so it
> can't be that hard.
You sound like a mathematician. They use "provable" interchangeably
with "trivial".
> It may simply be that the OS community do not generally have these
> skills.
There are a number of commercial violinists. Does that mean that
playing the violin can't be that hard?
The problem I see here is that an OCR task offers very little if any
synergies with LilyPond work. Another is that "a perfect
representation" is usually only available when the music _has_ already
been entered into a computer notation program.
--
David Kastrup