Re: casual contributors (was: patch going unpushed)

[Peter Chubb]

>>>>> "Graham" == Graham Percival <address@hidden> writes:

Graham> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 11:40:43PM +0000, James wrote:
>> 
>> >> Graham> We don't really have a frog meister, so nobody is taking
>> >> Graham> responsibility for pushing
>> >>

Graham> We should have somebody who takes care of contributors without
Graham> dedicated mentors.  In mathematical/logical terms, we need a
Graham> barber who shaves everybody who does not shave themselves.  I
Graham> shouldn't need to get involved when there's a new contributor,
Graham> much less a known+experienced contributor like Peter!

One issue is that the `How to participate' webpage at
http://lilypond.org/web/devel/participating/ doesn't point people at
Rietveld -- it just tells them (slightly incorrectly: there's a typo
in git format-patch) to send a patch
to lilypond-devel.

--
Dr Peter Chubb                                  peter.chubb AT nicta.com.au
http://www.ssrg.nicta.com.au          Software Systems Research Group/NICTA