|
From: | Phil Holmes |
Subject: | Re: Changes make test to allow output to be reviewed in a browser (issue 6442068) |
Date: | Wed, 1 Aug 2012 17:45:50 +0100 |
To: <address@hidden>; <address@hidden> Cc: <address@hidden>; <address@hidden> Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2012 5:32 PMSubject: Re: Changes make test to allow output to be reviewed in a browser (issue 6442068)
I have nothing to say other than seconding comments from Graham. http://codereview.appspot.com/6442068/diff/1/make/lysdoc-vars.make File make/lysdoc-vars.make (left): http://codereview.appspot.com/6442068/diff/1/make/lysdoc-vars.make#oldcode10 make/lysdoc-vars.make:10: LILYPOND_BOOK_FLAGS += --use-source-file-names On 2012/07/31 21:04:24, Graham Percival wrote:why?I second this reaction. BTW I hope regtest comparison between releases relies on "make doc" output and not on "make test"; if so this change is acceptable, otherwise it may break regtest comparison. http://codereview.appspot.com/6442068/
The line was deleted in that patch, since no PNGs were actually generated with the flag present.
That said, Graham was right and this does break regtest comparison, but not in a way that I currently understand. This is true even with formats=png,ps. I'm currently looking at what's going on and will certainly not propose anything else unless make check, etc., work.
--Phil Holmes
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |