Re: Naming _another_ lacking puzzle piece

[David Kastrup]

David Nalesnik <address@hidden> writes:

> On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 6:39 AM, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
>> "Phil Holmes" <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>> Surely this points to the pop operation in \override as being at
>>> fault?  If \override was simply push, rather than pop-push then the
>>> code above would seem to work as intended.
>>
>> Sure.  The idea presumably was not to have stack buildup from things
>> like
>>
>> \voiceOne c c \voiceTwo d d \voiceThree c c
>>
>
> Buildup of unwanted data or no, it would be useful to be able to write
> something like
>
> \toLast Accidental #'color
>
> to restore the previous override

But which is the "previous override" if you have several in a row?

-- 
David Kastrup