Re: Doc: Pitches.itely @knownissue OctavateEight grob (issue 6761045)

[pkx166h]

Reviewers: Trevor Daniels,

Message:
On 2012/10/24 14:57:28, Trevor Daniels wrote:
> LGTM, but just a thought - might it be better
> to override the colour so the change results in
> something visible rather than just an absence of
> the clef?
> Trevor

Good idea.

Next patch on its way.

James

Description:
Doc: Pitches.itely @knownissue OctavateEight grob

Issue 2832

Shows that any integers attached to a Clef is treated as a separate Grob
so any override applied to the Clef also has to be applied
as a separate override to the OctavateEight grob.

Includes brief description and @lilypond example.

Please review this at https://codereview.appspot.com/6761045/

Affected files:
  M Documentation/notation/pitches.itely


Index: Documentation/notation/pitches.itely
diff --git a/Documentation/notation/pitches.itely  
b/Documentation/notation/pitches.itely
index  
860babdc821d081bef8a96ed4042c699f1fc4683..3b7ca08ce8ec83c5cc8282e616a7e1f2de92b940  
100644
--- a/Documentation/notation/pitches.itely
+++ b/Documentation/notation/pitches.itely
@@ -1179,6 +1179,21 @@ Internals Reference:
 @rinternals{OctavateEight},
 @rinternals{clef-interface}.

address@hidden
+Any integers that are attached to clefs are treated as separate grobs,
+so any @code{\override} done to the @var{Clef} will also need to be
+applied, as a separate @code{\override}, to the @var{OctavateEight}
+grob.
+
address@hidden,quote,relative=1]
+\new Staff \with {
+  \override OctavateEight #'transparent = ##t
+  \override Clef #'transparent = ##t
+}
+
+\clef "treble_8" c4
address@hidden lilypond
+

 @node Key signature
 @unnumberedsubsubsec Key signature