Re: 2.16.1

[Phil Holmes]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "David Kastrup" <address@hidden>
To: <address@hidden>
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2012 5:36 PM
Subject: Re: 2.16.1


> "Phil Holmes" <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > I've just built 2.16.1 and will be uploading it later this evening.
> > All seems OK except I tried to create a regtest comparison versus
> > 2.16.0 and instead got a comparison of 2.17.6 versus 2.16.0.
>
> But you are certain that the binary itself is 2.16.1?  How would it
> produce a comparison of 2.17.6?
>
> --
> David Kastrup


The binary is certainly named as 2.16.1 so I've no doubt that it is 2.16.1 - 
it was also built from stable/2.16 and there's not 2.17.6 code there.  I'm 
assuming that VERSION has 2.17.6 unstable, and it does a regtest comparison 
with the highest numbered release - or at least says it does.  I don't think 
this is likely to be more than an oddity.

--
Phil Holmes