[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Freezing for 2.18
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: Freezing for 2.18 |
Date: |
Tue, 12 Mar 2013 00:36:19 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 03:37:30PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
> Colin Hall <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > Absolutely. I thought that we had adopted this proposal:
> >
> > http://lilypond.org/~graham/gop/gop_3.html
>
> So what?
>
> The policy is: David Kastrup has sole authority over what goes into
> stable/2.16 and which release(s) will have a version number of
> 2.16.x, until 2012 Dec 31.
>
> For one thing, we are not talking about 2.16. For another, the deadline
> has passed.
I'm comfortable adopting a similar policy:
David Kastrup has sole authority over what goes into stable/2.18
and which release(s) will have a version number of 2.18.x, until
2013 Dec 31.
- Graham
- Re: Freezing for 2.18, (continued)
- Re: Freezing for 2.18, Colin Hall, 2013/03/11
- Re: Freezing for 2.18, David Kastrup, 2013/03/11
- Re: Freezing for 2.18, Janek Warchoł, 2013/03/11
- Re: Freezing for 2.18, David Kastrup, 2013/03/11
- Re: Freezing for 2.18, Janek Warchoł, 2013/03/11
- Re: Freezing for 2.18, David Kastrup, 2013/03/11
- Re: Freezing for 2.18, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/03/11
- Re: Freezing for 2.18, Janek Warchoł, 2013/03/11
- Re: Freezing for 2.18,
Graham Percival <=
- Re: Freezing for 2.18, David Kastrup, 2013/03/12
Re: Freezing for 2.18, Marc Hohl, 2013/03/10
Re: Freezing for 2.18, Trevor Daniels, 2013/03/11