[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: R shorthand
From: |
Kieren MacMillan |
Subject: |
Re: R shorthand |
Date: |
Tue, 19 Mar 2013 19:38:10 -0400 |
Hi Shane,
> one would think that might cause more difficult
> programming necessitating the keeping tracking of various R values
> through out the piece as defined by a time signature as opposed to us
> setting the value, which probably would also slow down lilypond having
> to parse and hang on to that extra undeclared information.
Possibly — that's exactly why I posted the question.
> But I do believe making sure the user is
> forced to think out the value of R duration is probably more useful
> than any minimal convenience, especially as Joram points out that
> would make r and R functionality divergent.
r and R functionality is already divergent (e.g., placement) — so that's hardly
an additional concern at this point.
Best,
Kieren.
- R shorthand, Kieren MacMillan, 2013/03/19
- Re: R shorthand, David Kastrup, 2013/03/19
- Re: R shorthand, Jan-Peter Voigt, 2013/03/20
- Re: R shorthand, David Kastrup, 2013/03/20
- Re: R shorthand, Jan-Peter Voigt, 2013/03/20