Re: Updates to NR sections 3 and 4 (issue 10782045)

[dak]

https://codereview.appspot.com/10782045/diff/1/Documentation/notation/input.itely
File Documentation/notation/input.itely (right):

https://codereview.appspot.com/10782045/diff/1/Documentation/notation/input.itely#newcode2198
Documentation/notation/input.itely:2198: \relative c'' {
On 2013/06/30 07:11:23, Trevor Daniels wrote:
> No.  \relative must be applied to the music
> in a constant sequence, not to a sequence that
> might change depending on the tags.

Well, it is perfectly "legal" to use \relative like this, it just is
unlikely to lead to reliable results unless you put something like
\resetRelativeOctave c'' after each tagged sequence.

In other words, I support undoing this change.

https://codereview.appspot.com/10782045/diff/1/Documentation/notation/input.itely#newcode2535
Documentation/notation/input.itely:2535: \score { ... }
Actually, it would make more sense to write
@example
showLastLength = R1*5
\score @{ @dots{} @}
@end example
There is no need to use @verbatim here.

https://codereview.appspot.com/10782045/