lilypond-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: epic slur fail!


From: Jean-Charles Malahieude
Subject: Re: epic slur fail!
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 19:38:38 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0

Le 14/11/2013 20:52, Janek Warchoł disait :

The 2nd and 3rd examples of 0.6 slurs look very bad to me.  Do you
have a minimal code example?


Here it is:
\version "2.17.95"
<<
\new Staff { \relative c { \clef bass
 b'4(^"default" b,) e2
\once \override Slur.details.max-slope = 0.8 b'4(^"0.8" b,) e2
\once \override Slur.details.max-slope = 0.6 b'4(^"0.6" b,) e2 } }
\new Staff { \relative c { \clef bass
  b4(^"default" b') e,2
\once \override Slur.details.max-slope = 0.8 b4(^"0.8" b') e,2
\once \override Slur.details.max-slope = 0.6 b4(^"0.6" b') e,2 } }
\new Staff { \relative c { \clef bass
  b4_(^"down" b') e,2
\once \override Slur.details.max-slope = 0.8 b4_(^"0.8" b') e,2
\once \override Slur.details.max-slope = 0.6 b4_(^"0.6" b') e,2 } } >>

From my eyes, the third 0.6 looks like a mirror of the first, and is in my opinion not so "bad".

The second would have looked better with a "raised" left bound, let's say vertically aligned with the top of the stem?

Cheers,
Jean-Charles




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]