[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 3.0?
From: |
Carl Sorensen |
Subject: |
Re: 3.0? |
Date: |
Fri, 10 Jan 2014 22:07:46 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.9.131030 |
On 1/9/14 9:43 PM, "SoundsFromSound" <address@hidden> wrote:
>dak wrote
>> Joseph Rushton Wakeling <That must be the reason why the typical
>>Word document features the
>> consistent use of document styles for arriving at typographically
>> superior results.
>>
>> --
>> David Kastrup
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>I honestly have never seen ONE Word document make use of styles. I'm not
>kidding. In all the docs I've come across in all areas, people never use
>them. Seriously! :)
I use styles anytime I have to make a serious Word document (i.e. when I
can't use LaTeX). Of course, that's probably part of the reason that I
like LilyPondÅ .
Carl
- Re: 3.0?, (continued)
- Re: 3.0?, Paul Morris, 2014/01/11
- Re: 3.0?, Carl Peterson, 2014/01/12
- Re: 3.0?, Janek Warchoł, 2014/01/12
- Re: 3.0?, David Kastrup, 2014/01/12
- Re: 3.0?, Urs Liska, 2014/01/12
- Re: 3.0?, Joseph Rushton Wakeling, 2014/01/09
- Re: 3.0?, David Kastrup, 2014/01/09
- Re: 3.0?, Urs Liska, 2014/01/09
- Re: 3.0?, Joseph Rushton Wakeling, 2014/01/09
- Re: 3.0?, SoundsFromSound, 2014/01/09
- Re: 3.0?,
Carl Sorensen <=
Re: 3.0?, Phil Holmes, 2014/01/09
Re: 3.0?, David Kastrup, 2014/01/09