|
From: | Alex Loomis |
Subject: | Re: how close are we to having an "addAt" or "insertAt" feature? |
Date: | Wed, 15 Jan 2014 19:45:11 -0500 |
Hi Werner,
If you’re talking about \mark \default, then I could see the benefit of that. The problem is, most of us overload \mark for a bunch of non \default stuff (e.g., ‘eyeglasses’, text instructions, etc.), because there’s no other mechanism available. And I doubt it would be easy to implement your suggestion “filtered” to only the \default marks.
> I suggest that such a command allows for a third, optional parameter,
> which makes \addAt relative to the `rehearsalMark' property.
But I’m always happy to be proven wrong!
Cheers,
Kieren.
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |