[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Improve positioning of tuplet numbers for kneed beams. (issue 586100
From: |
david . nalesnik |
Subject: |
Re: Improve positioning of tuplet numbers for kneed beams. (issue 58610044) |
Date: |
Sun, 09 Feb 2014 22:43:34 +0000 |
On 2014/02/09 21:23:29, janek wrote:
this ROCKS!
:)
What about "more than 1 tuplet per beam group" and "nested tuplets"?
My head
explodes every time i see these examples!
The "more than 1 tuplet per beam group" is actually covered by the
French beaming example.
I could include the nested tuplet stuff, but would you have any
objection to adding it later, after this patch is through? This is
getting *huge*!
https://codereview.appspot.com/58610044/