lilypond-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Doc: Point-and-Click has wrong default value and ref to SVG output n


From: pkx166h
Subject: Re: Doc: Point-and-Click has wrong default value and ref to SVG output needs adding (issue 61630045)
Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2014 06:51:17 +0000

Looking at the TexInfo page for @acronym

https://www.gnu.org/software/texinfo/manual/texinfo/html_node/_0040acronym.html

It doesn't seem to give us anything that useful and perhaps (as it also
says in the link above):

- In general, it's not essential to use either of these commands for all
abbreviations; use your judgment. Text is perfectly readable without
them.

So unless anyone has strong feelings - and we can have a new tracker - I
think I'll leave them unformatted.




https://codereview.appspot.com/61630045/diff/20001/Documentation/usage/running.itely
File Documentation/usage/running.itely (right):

https://codereview.appspot.com/61630045/diff/20001/Documentation/usage/running.itely#newcode409
Documentation/usage/running.itely:409: SVG output should be compatible
with any SVG editor or user agent. There
On 2014/02/14 10:24:08, Devon Schudy wrote:
Most users don't know the term "user agent". Maybe "browser" or
"viewer"
instead?

I Removed the sentence (see David's comment).

https://codereview.appspot.com/61630045/diff/20001/Documentation/usage/running.itely#newcode409
Documentation/usage/running.itely:409: SVG output should be compatible
with any SVG editor or user agent. There
On 2014/02/14 10:49:04, dak wrote:
On 2014/02/14 10:24:08, Devon Schudy wrote:
> Most users don't know the term "user agent". Maybe "browser" or
"viewer"
> instead?

I don't understand what this is trying to get at.  First it says it
"should" be
compatible with any SVG reader.  Then it mentions that you might want
to try
some option for using different font files.  So it isn't compatible
with any
reader?  Or what's the point?

At any rate, if a certain file format is produced, the expectation is
that it is
useful for programs reading that format.  Short of any useful
information to the
contrary, this sentence should just get removed.

Done.

https://codereview.appspot.com/61630045/diff/20001/Documentation/usage/running.itely#newcode675
Documentation/usage/running.itely:675: size increases in PDFfiles.
On 2014/02/14 10:24:08, Devon Schudy wrote:
Missing space: "PDFfiles"

Done.

https://codereview.appspot.com/61630045/



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]