|
From: | Phil Holmes |
Subject: | Re: Issue 3917: Add \alternatingTimeSignatures (issue 97110045) |
Date: | Sat, 10 May 2014 15:01:12 +0100 |
To: <address@hidden> Sent: Saturday, May 10, 2014 12:23 PM Subject: Re: Issue 3917: Add \alternatingTimeSignatures (issue 97110045)
Thanks, I'll update accordingly. Generally speaking, should a modification of this kind trigger a new review cycle or can I update it "privately" and include it when pushing?
I would say it depends how controversial the changes are. If there have been a few helpful comments that it's easy to take account of, I would not go for a further review, but would be careful to assume my pushed patch covers the comments. Where there is debate and discussion, a further review.
--Phil Holmes
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |