[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Remove redundant occurences of this-> (issue 258870043 by address@hi
From: |
dak |
Subject: |
Re: Remove redundant occurences of this-> (issue 258870043 by address@hidden) |
Date: |
Thu, 23 Jul 2015 06:38:00 +0000 |
https://codereview.appspot.com/258870043/diff/1/lily/grob.cc
File lily/grob.cc (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/258870043/diff/1/lily/grob.cc#newcode232
lily/grob.cc:232: /* This version of get_system is more reliable than
get_system ()
On 2015/07/23 05:50:38, Keith wrote:
What do you mean by "get_system is more reliable than get_system ()" ?
Actually, what did the original author mean by "more reliable than
this->get_system ()"?
I can perfectly well write "me->get_system ()" to call the non-static
member function get_system (). I don't need a this-pointer to call it,
even though whatever pointer I call it through then becomes the
this-pointer _inside_ of the function.
To preserve meaning, there must be some to start with.
https://codereview.appspot.com/258870043/
- Re: Remove redundant occurences of this-> (issue 258870043 by address@hidden), dak, 2015/07/21
- Re: Remove redundant occurences of this-> (issue 258870043 by address@hidden), nine . fierce . ballads, 2015/07/21
- Re: Remove redundant occurences of this-> (issue 258870043 by address@hidden), dak, 2015/07/21
- Re: Remove redundant occurences of this-> (issue 258870043 by address@hidden), nine . fierce . ballads, 2015/07/21
- Re: Remove redundant occurences of this-> (issue 258870043 by address@hidden), k-ohara5a5a, 2015/07/23
- Re: Remove redundant occurences of this-> (issue 258870043 by address@hidden), dak, 2015/07/23
- Re: Remove redundant occurences of this-> (issue 258870043 by address@hidden),
dak <=
- Re: Remove redundant occurences of this-> (issue 258870043 by address@hidden), dak, 2015/07/23
- Re: Remove redundant occurences of this-> (issue 258870043 by address@hidden), dak, 2015/07/23