[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Music glyph design choices
From: |
tisimst |
Subject: |
Re: Music glyph design choices |
Date: |
Mon, 10 Aug 2015 09:32:15 -0700 (MST) |
On 8/9/2015 10:38 PM, Werner LEMBERG [via Lilypond] wrote:
> The same as with the double-flat: we need evidence from real-world
> scores to decide this.
>
> Do you have time to check this?
A quick scan through IMSLP:
1. (Breikopf & Hartel, 1880) Chopin, Polonaise in B-flat minor:
Identical flats
2. (Peters, 1895) Grieg, Piano Concerto in A-minor (for piano 4 hands):
Identical flats
3. (Universal, 1920) Bartok, Studies for Piano, Op. 18: Identical flats
This is in way definitive, but seems like nice evidence for using
identical flats. I'd be very interested in seeing a score where they
were intentionally /not/ identical.
- Abraham
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Music-glyph-design-choices-tp179329p179437.html
Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
- Music glyph design choices, tisimst, 2015/08/07
- Re: Music glyph design choices, Werner LEMBERG, 2015/08/08
- Re: Music glyph design choices, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2015/08/08
- Re: Music glyph design choices, tisimst, 2015/08/09
- Re: Music glyph design choices, Werner LEMBERG, 2015/08/10
- Re: Music glyph design choices,
tisimst <=
- Re: Music glyph design choices, Abraham Lee, 2015/08/10
- Re: Music glyph design choices, Phil Holmes, 2015/08/10
- Re: Music glyph design choices, tisimst, 2015/08/10
- Re: Music glyph design choices, Simon Albrecht, 2015/08/11
- Re: Music glyph design choices, Werner LEMBERG, 2015/08/11