|
From: | dak |
Subject: | Re: Implement make-bow-stencil, make-tie-stencil for use in markup-commands undertie and overtie (issue 270640043 by address@hidden) |
Date: | Thu, 12 Nov 2015 15:20:51 +0000 |
On 2015/11/11 09:56:16, thomasmorley651 wrote:
Well, outer/inner-control rely on the user-settable variables
bow-height and
thickness.
Ok, didn't notice that. I'm not sure it's the best interface to have those in semi-absolute dimensions but at least with thickness it would be sort-of consistent with other uses. I'd still consider it cleanest to create the basic shape in unit size (meaning that one would scale down those dimensions by length-to-print). Everything else being equal, it would be nicest to write stuff in a manner where one does not need to divide by length-to-print (or some similar dimension) at all so that stuff does not get instable when the size happens to be zero. But I don't see that this can be achieved when we have something like a non-zero bow-height since it requires a direction to put the non-zero-wide bow in, and (dx, dy) = (0, 0) is not useful for that. https://codereview.appspot.com/270640043/
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |