Re: plan for 2.20 release?

[Simon Albrecht]

On 14.11.2015 14:40, Federico Bruni wrote:
> Hi
>
> There's any plan for the next stable release?

Good question. It’s odd to keep telling people on -user how they should 
upgrade to an unstable version, which some don’t dare do, although it’s 
actually quite stable.

> I'm asking out of curiosity and also because I'd like to add some more 
> translations in the next month.
>
> I see a long list of new features and only (?) 3 regressions:
> https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/search/?q=%28_type%3ACritical+OR+labels%3ARegression%29+AND+%28status%3ANew+OR+status%3AAccepted+OR+status%3AStarted%29 

4316: I’ve reconsidered and don’t think it’s a regression, and 
definitely not one to block a stable release.
4182: Yes, that is a regression, though it’s not _particularly_ nasty, 
but it shouldn’t be in a really stable release.
3778: This has been a regression against 2.16, but the CG (8.3, Issue 
classification) says regressions against the ‘current and previous’ 
stable versions should be tagged ‘regression’.

Yours, Simon