Re: Implement make-bow-stencil, make-tie-stencil for use in markup-commands undertie and overtie (issue 270640043 by address@hidden)

[thomasmorley65]

On 2015/11/18 23:01:20, thomasmorley651 wrote:
> On 2015/11/16 15:57:49, dak wrote:

> > If we are sure we'll never need to change the direction based on the
> > markup direction (like, say, over/under actual note glyphs?), I'd
just
> implement
> > commands undertie/overtie that call some internal function with the
direction
> to
> > use directly.

> Done this way. Right now I can't imagine any use-case for relying on
> direction-modifiers.
> If there is use for it sometime in the future we may change this
again,
> ofcourse.

> >
> > If there may be a use case for inheriting direction, some directable
markup
> > command may be useful.  Either it is called (with an appropriate
explicit
> > direction override) by undertie/overtie, or all three call the same
internal
> > function.

Changed my mind, because I found a not uncommon use-case for a
tie-command relying on direction-modifiers and \voiceXxx:

m = {
  c''1 \prall -\tweak text \markup \tie "131" -1
}

{ \voiceOne \m \voiceTwo \m }

This is used in scores for guitar quite often and I seem to remember
having seen similiar in piano-scores indicating silent finger changes.

@James
sorry for the additional work


https://codereview.appspot.com/270640043/