lilypond-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: git cl problem: Couldn’t create Allura issue


From: Phil Holmes
Subject: Re: git cl problem: Couldn’t create Allura issue
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2015 16:26:41 -0000

----- Original Message ----- From: "Simon Albrecht" <address@hidden>
To: "Phil Holmes" <address@hidden>; "ly-devel" <address@hidden>
Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2015 4:19 PM
Subject: Re: git cl problem: Couldn’t create Allura issue


On 29.12.2015 15:38, Phil Holmes wrote:
----- Original Message ----- From: "Simon Albrecht" <address@hidden>
To: "ly-devel" <address@hidden>
Sent: Monday, December 28, 2015 10:12 PM
Subject: git cl problem: Couldn’t create Allura issue


Hello,

sorry, but I still don’t seem to get along with git cl. I just uploaded a patch and it went fine until:

    ~/lilypond-git (dev/doc)$ git cl upload origin/master
Documentation/learning/common-notation.itely | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++--
     1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
    Upload server: codereview.appspot.com (change with -s/--server)
    Your browser has been opened to visit:

https://codereview.appspot.com/get-access-token?port=8001

    If your browser is on a different machine then exit and re-run
    upload.py with the command-line parameter

      --no_oauth2_webbrowser

    Issue created. URL: http://codereview.appspot.com/280560043
    Uploading base file for Documentation/learning/common-notation.itely
    We were not able to associate this patch with a tracker issue.
    Please enter a valid tracker issue number
    (or enter nothing to create a new issue):
    Error code 403


The config seems to be OK: (I hid the bearer token)

    ~/lilypond-git (dev/doc)$ git cl config
    Rietveld server (host[:port]) [codereview.appspot.com]:
    Allura server [http://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/]:
    Allura bearer token (see https://sourceforge.net/auth/oauth/) [xxxx]:
    CC list ("x" to clear) address@hidden:

Yours, Simon


I'm wondering if this is just a co-incidence: sourceforge seems slow currently.

Indeed. I’ll make more attempts then. It just failed in the very same
way (forgot to pull git-cl beforehand), so I created the allura issue
manually in order to not clutter the Rietveld issue with more identical
patch sets. Perhaps git cl could be enhanced with options to do only the
Rietveld or Allura parts of the process?

Yours, Simon

=============================================

I think it is intended to, but I may have destroyed that capability during the updates.

--
Phil Holmes



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]