Re: Problem with staging?

[Masamichi HOSODA]

>> It seemed that this was because I had removed texlive-xetex - in order
>> to test that 'configure' showed the correct information and warned me
>> if I tried to run it without it installed.
>>
>> However I really struggled to get any kind of successful doc compile
>> even when I apt-get installed texlive-xetex again.
>>
>> In the end I just removed my whole build env. and reinstalled it all
>> again, but this time I didn't install texlive-xetex but just what is
>> (currently) in the Contributor Guide, only because I think the
>> expectation of Hosoda-san was that we should still be able to compile
>> doc without XeTeX installed and the build scripts defaults to Pdf2Tex
>> (if I have followed the threads on dev correctly?).
>>
>> This is not the case.
>>
>> It doesn't matter to me either way, but at the moment it seems that
>> texlive-xetex is now *mandatory* and not optional. As most users that
>> 'build' LilyPond will only build the binaries and not the Doc (or the
>> website), then it probably won't be noticed but if this was not the
>> expected behaviour then we need to 'fix' something, else we need now
>> make texlive-xetext mandatory.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> -- 
>> James
> 
> I believe that this is
> https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/4782/
> 
> --
> Phil Holmes 

I believe that that problem is fixed by Issue 4782.

I've pushed it to staging.
So now, LilyPond documents can build without texlive-xetex package.

Sorry.